Where do I start, well, might just start from what I want to say the most:
I want to make clear that I hate each and every minute I spend on this post. All the bits of my mind demands me to stay out, pretend never seen it, but if I do so, I would acquiescently defy my own words, my own deeds, now and forever since, and I can not drop this guilt until death.
Don??t mistake me offended for I am not, the things offended and threatened, I believe, are the things that Only-now and whom else I??m going to quote hold dear, and I will spend the rest of this post to show it to you. If those things you consider not worthy, or could be sacrificed, then call me wrong and loser.
I start here:
Quote:
war DOES bring peace
Why? Maybe it??s because:
Quote:
you have to feel pain before you feel pleasure. You have to makes things worse, to make them better.
Till here, this argument, like so many others, is just not making perfect sense. Not making perfect sense is not a sin, but then, some deeper voice arose:
Quote:
The other side can't bring more violence, if they don't exist
Those statements are sins and offence and threat to the very concept you and I call ??peace??. The definition of ??peace?? is ??a static and stable state in which two or more different people/cultures/countries coexist??. I may not be accurate with definition, but the very core of both the ??peace?? and ??freedom?? concepts involve tolerance to difference. If annihilating one side in an opposition hence destroy the difference is someway to reach the peace, then the world ??peace?? could easily be attained by killing all humans on this earth to leave one, who could live in this ??peace?? and ??freedom?? never to reproduce and die. I do not want this ??peace?? and ??freedom??, I will fight to death with this ??peace?? and ??freedom??.
If I remembered correctly, the above quotation demonstrate word ??imperialism??, the exact opposite of ??peace?? and ??freedom??, in which one voice, one power make the righteousness. Actually someone just provided an example:
Formal British Empire sells imperialism, but they don??t advertise it using ??peace?? or ??freedom??. Thus, if someone here like this version of world, go forth say it: ??I love slavery.?? Don??t try deluding yourself by mixing war and peace, freedom and power, good and evil for all these are lies and sins.
Furthermore, there are some additional comment provided in relationship of peace and war:
Quote:
The way in which the United States (since thats the only place I can speak for) fights wars, is MUCH more humane, and precise than WW1, or WW2.
Quote:
This new style, or imporvement will allow us to do so without losing a large amount of men, property, or killing innocent civilians.
It??s good for Only-now that he still feels:
Quote:
that is sort of a selfish viewpoint.
Nonetheless, this is not selfish, this is criminal. Method doesn??t justify the cause, this is too simple to cost my time proving, but that aside for now. The worse part is that Only-now was suggesting U.S. to go into a war in which she has no business by a reason that U.S. can hardly harm herself doing that. It is the equivalent to suggesting a man go into murder because ??guns are so good you risk little yourself??. This is a clear sin.
United States can fight a war so humane that by giving her enemies euthanasia yet it won??t be a humane war, it won??t be humane to innocent Americans who absently share a part in a wrong even evil plot, it won??t be humane to U.S. soldiers to shred their blood in a bad cause.
And are wars precise today? Maybe in the battlefield, but not the whole picture. Even weapon is precise, hatred is not. Wars today are using labeled bomb, missiles wrapped by ideology to create delusion, they suck more and more formally innocent and peaceful people into this mass by mixing truth with lie. No, war are less precise then they used to be.
I am not an antiwar enthusiast, and I??m not saying this to protect world peace. Whether U.S. or some poster here like or enjoy wars are not my business, but I??m speaking in the absence of voice that should be present for the interest of U.S. and you, Only-now??s good conscious. I won??t blame any foreigner to love to see U.S. wars, but as self-declared U.S. citizen, I accuse you, Only-now, a crime, in wishing and publicly motivating your own country into an unnecessary war.
Finally
Quote:
I think if the world wants peace from these terrorists. They have to be destroyed.
This is not specifically against whom I quoted from, but against a common sense today and the biggest lie I saw in my entire life.
Terrorists, they appears in papers, TVs, video games everyday. But what are they?
Are terrorists human beings?
If they??re not, they are some highly dangerous yet highly intelligent life form besides human. We should have protected them for the use of scientific study like wildlife or started building relationship with their civilization, yet we did not. That is saying they are still human.
If terrorists are human, what do they want? Killing other human? This doesn??t fit into our understanding, history and definition of humanity. The media want us to believe that terrorists want nothing other than killing and destruction, but hell, knowledge and logic doesn??t support such existence on earth.
Quote:
Terrorism is the unlawful use or threatened use of force or violence by a person or an organized group against people or property with the intention of intimidating or coercing societies or governments, often for ideological or political reasons.
So, terrorists are up for ??ideological and political reasons??. To put it more simply, they are persons have unpopular ideas as myself, but only state their mind by guns.
By this definition, if a country unlawfully(unjustly) open or threaten to open a war against another country, this is indeed a practice of terrorism. And ??because a comic made by a paper?? or ??because we have difference in freedom of speech?? are ??unlawful?? cases, so as ??they are terrorists??.
Terrorism was made by wars, abuses of violence, insufficiency and absence of listening. ??Anti-terrorist war?? is a self-contradictory term. ??anti-terrorist defense?? is more appropriate, ??anti-terrorist war?? is using the very idea of terrorism to fight terrorists only turned its own fighters into terrorists.
Indeed, terrorism must be destroyed. terrorism, not ??terrorists??, who are only human bent under this evil thought. But be warned: ??terrorism?? is not an invention of terrorists and not their patent, they??re not specific to poor people in mid-eastern countries, but rather, it lurks in all minds.
I end it here.
These are not all things I can quote and I can show, but mains are here. This is not my final comment on the subject. I do hope the truth is cleared and this can be over, but if it??s not, I will go on. Now I accused a named member and probably offended a lot more. However much freedom of speech is here, I used it. I never considered ??freedom of speech?? as ??speak whatever you want??, so I will count myself and my world lucky if this post survived.
